Rare case of diabetic neuropathic cachexia along with diabetic amyotrophy

  1. Zahid Ullah Khan 1,
  2. Nasrullah Ghuman 2 and
  3. KaHinKaren Mak 3
  1. 1 Gastroenterology, Southend Hospital, Westcliff-on-Sea, Essex, UK
  2. 2 Acute Medicine, Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Westcliff-on-Sea, Essex, UK
  3. 3 Acute Medical Unit, Southend Hospital, Westcliff-on-Sea, Essex, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Zahid Ullah Khan; drzahid1983@yahoo.com

Publication history

Accepted:07 May 2021
First published:31 May 2021
Online issue publication:31 May 2021

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

A 65-year-old patient with background of alcohol excess and previous gunshot wounds was admitted with significant weight loss, leg cramps, dizziness and lethargy for the last 3 months. He was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus in July 2020 and was started on Metformin and Gliclazide by his in July; he was later commenced on alogliptin and empaglaflozin by diabetes specialist nurse in early August. He also had generalised muscle wasting, dorsal guttering in both hands and was cachectic when he presented to hospital. His haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was 124 mmol/mol in July 2020 and was 63 mmol/mol in September 2020. The patient had negative autoimmune and TB screen. CT abdomen/pelvis and CT lumbosacral spine that showed mild diverticular disease and bilateral L5 spondylolysis with L5-S1 spondylotic changes. Electrophysiological studies confirmed sensory motor peripheral neuropathy. Patient was diagnosed with diabetic neuropathic cachexia secondary to poorly controlled diabetes and was commenced on 30 units two times per day of NovoMix 30 insulin; this was adjusted to 24 units two times per day in endocrine clinic 3 months later, after gaining 10 kg in weight. Good glycaemic control is key to the management of such cases and, therefore, we recommend early referral to diabetes specialist input for consideration of insulin therapy.

Background

Diabetic neuropathic cachexia (DNC) is associated with poor glycaemic control and is reversible over weeks to months. This was first reported by Ellenberg and the classic hallmark of DNC consists of varying degrees of symmetrical painful sensory and motor peripheral neuropathy.1 These patients may also have autonomic neuropathy symptoms such as gastroparesis, altered bowel habit, orthostatism and impotence.1 Patients also have reports of anorexia, emaciation of fat and lean muscle mass and may report of emotional instability.2 One case study reported the same patient to have DNC two times due to poorly controlled diabetes, which improved with adequate glycaemic control.3 Hence, it is important to identify this problem early and the clinical features can be reversed within a few months if appropriate treatment is initiated.

Case presentation

This 65-year-old patient had a previous medical history of gunshot wounds 40 years ago in both legs and alcohol excess for 20–25 years. He developed symptoms of daytime and nocturnal polyuria and polydipsia at the beginning of 2020. Following this, he noticed symptoms of tingling, numbness and cold sensation in his feet over the next few months. He also reported of weight loss for 3–4 months prior to his diagnosis with diabetes. He could not get an outpatient hospital appointment due to COVID-19 and saw his GP a few times for his symptoms during this period. He was formally diagnosed as having type 2 diabetes mellitus by his GP in July 2020 and was commenced on gliclazide and metformin. He subsequently developed symptoms of night sweats, dizziness, altered bowel habit (predominantly constipation), anorexia and had lost approximately 4.5 kg weight over the preceding 6 months. These symptoms adversely affected his quality of life, including his mood and sleep.

He was then referred to diabetes specialist nurse who added empaglaflozin and alogliptin in August. His symptoms continued to get worse and his partner brought him to his local hospital emergency department. He was noted to have generalised muscle wasting and dorsal guttering in both hands due to profound muscle wasting (figures 1 and 2). His power was 2/5 in the left lower limb and 4/5 in the right lower limb. His ankle reflexes were bilaterally diminished and plantar reflexes were equivocal. His right knee jerk was intact but was absent on the left side. His coordination was intact on the right side but was unable to fully assess the left side, due to weakness. He was also noted to have glove and stocking distribution of sensory impairment.

Figure 1

Upper limbs of patient showing significant muscle wasting.

Figure 2

Dorsal surface of the hands showing significant muscle wasting.

His blood showed elevated HbA1c 124 mmol/mol; however, his renal function, thyroid function, vitamin B12, folate and ferritin were normal. His blood glucose was 22.0 on admission. His autoimmune screen including coeliac screen was negative. His CT thorax/abdomen/pelvis (TAP) and CT lumbar spine revealed no structural bony lesion.

He was admitted to the metabolic ward under the endocrinology team. Insulin NovoMix 30 was commenced at 30 units two times per day dosing. The patient was reviewed by Neurology consultant during admission and had nerve conduction studies (NCS) that confirmed the presence of peripheral sensory motor neuropathy. This was deemed to be due to poorly controlled diabetes after exclusion of other causes. He was discharged with outpatient follow-up.

He was reviewed in diabetes clinic after 3 months and his weight had improved from 43 to 53 kg, he had also made a significant improvement in symptoms. His HbA1c had reduced to 50 mmol/mol and his insulin dose was titrated accordingly to 24 units two times per day.

Investigations

Patient had blood including autoimmune screen, which is shown in table 1. Patient also had CT CAP that did not show any sinister pathology and CT lumbar spine showed only L5-S1 spondylotic changes.

Table 1

Blood results in September 2020

Bloods Value Bloods Value
Hb 143 Urea 4.1
WCC 5.2 Creat 49
Plt 371 Na 133
MCV 87.4 K 4.3
Neut 2.84 CRP <01
ALT 274 Bilirubin 11
ALP 71 Alb 41
Anti TTG (IgA) 2.0 ANA 0.1
Anti-insulin antibody 7.8 NMDA receptor antibodies Negative
Amphiphysin antibody Negative Anti CV2/CRMP-5 antibody Negative
Anti PNMA2 (Ma2/Ta) antibody Negative HbA1c 124 mmol/mol
  • HbA1C, haemoglobin A1c.

CT lumbosacral spine

Bilateral L5 spondylolysis with L5-S1 spondylotic changes without any compromise of the bony spinal canal.

CT thorax/abdomen/pelvis

A small duodenal diverticulum is noted along the medial aspect of the second part of the duodenum. Features suggest no sinister pathology has been identified in the chest, abdomen and pelvis.

NCS and electromyography

The electrophysiological findings are in keeping with sensory motor poly neuropathy. In the presence of neuropathy, it is hard to assess radiculopathy. The result of NCS and EMG is shown above in the above 03 tables from table 2, figures 3 and 4.

Table 2

EMG summary table

Spontaneous MUAP Recruitment
Muscle Nerve Roots IA Fib PSW Fasc H.F. Amp Dur. PPP Pattern
R.Tibialis anterior Deep peroneal (fibular) L4-L5 N None None None None N N N Reduced
L.Tibialis anterior Deep peroneal (fibular) L4-L5 1+ 2+ 2+ None None N N N Reduced
R.Gastrocnemius (medial head) Tibial S1-S2 N None None None None N N N Reduced
R.Gastrocnemius (lateral head) Tibial S1-S2 N None None None None N N N Reduced
L.Gastrocnemius (medial head) Tibial S1-S2 N None None None None N N N Reduced
L.Gastrocnemius (lateral head) Tibial S1-S2 N None None None None N N N Reduced
R.Vastus lateralis Femoral L2-L4 N None None None None N N N N
L.Vastus lateralis Femoral L2-L4 N None None None None N N N N
R.First dorsal interosseous Ulnar C8-T1 N None None None None N N N N
R.Extensor digitorum communis Radial C7-C8 N None None None None N N N N
L.Adductor magnus Obturator L2-L4 1+ 1+ 1+ None None N N 1+ Reduced
Table 3

Repeat blood results 8 January 2021

Bloods Value Bloods Value
Hb 137 Urea 4.9
WCC 5.3 Creat 42
Plt 271 Na 132
MCV 90.5 K 4.6
Neut 2.67 CRP 1
ALT 27 Bilirubin 16
ALP 122 Alb 41
Vitamin B12 341 Ferritin 423
Cortisol 264 Folate 7.7
T4 12.8 HbA1c 50
TSH 3.72
  • HbA1C, haemoglobin A1c.

Figure 3

Motor nerve conduction studies.

Figure 4

Sensory nerve conduction studies.

Differential diagnosis

The common differential diagnosis includes chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), which has an insidious onset and is a progressive or relapsing symmetric sensorimotor disorder. It includes weakness of both proximal and distal limbs and motor symptoms are predominant. Sensory impairment is usually greater for vibration and position sense than for pain and temperature sense.

Autonomic symptoms are very mild. Another common feature in these patients is intention tremor and gait ataxia. NCS studies show peripheral nerve demyelination; however, there was no evidence of demyelination on NCS and no other common features of CIDP were present in this patient. Furthermore, improvement after treatment with insulin makes this very unlikely.

Another common differential diagnosis is spinal cord tumour or metastatic lesion; these tend to have pain as the predominant feature, which was not seen here. No such lesion was seen on imaging in this case.

Patients with vitamin B12 and folate deficiency could have similar symptoms along with macrocytic anaemia, and motor symptoms are predominant. The neuropathic symptoms are symmetrical, affecting legs more than arms. The classic hallmark of vitamin B12 deficiency is subacute combined degeneration of the cord, which can present with ataxia, progressive weakness, paraesthesia that may progress to spasticity and paraplegia. They may also have insomnia, irritability, cognitive impairment, dementia, impaired vibration and position sense and positive Romberg test. The imaging, lack of intrinsic factor antibodies and vitamin B12 and folate level in this patient makes this diagnosis unlikely.4

Alcoholic polyneuropathy is a gradual and progressive disease affecting sensory, motor and autonomic nerves and symptoms are symmetrical and distal. The most common neurologic signs are loss of tendon reflexes, defective perception of touch and vibration sensation. This patient had grossly unremarkable reflexes and intact dorsal column along with MCV and GGT within normal range.

Toxic neuropathy is another possible differential, which could be due to drugs, chemical abuse or industrial chemical exposure. The common toxins responsible include lead, mercury, ethylene oxide, carbon disulphide, thallium and dimethylaminopropionitrile. This patient did not have any history of exposure to the above toxins.

Paraneoplastic syndrome and vasculitis may also present with sensory motor symptoms. The imaging and autoimmune screen is against this diagnosis as these did not suggest the presence of suspicious lesions.4

Treatment

This patient was initially commenced on oral antidiabetic medications by his GP and was referred to diabetes specialist nurses who added to alogliptin and empaglaflozin to his existing metformin and gliclazide. The patient, however, continued to lose weight and developed night sweats, tingling in his lower limbs and weakness in his lower limbs due to muscle wasting (figures 5–7) and was referred to ambulatory care by his GP. Patient was seen by medical team and he had urgent CT TAP and CT lumbosacral spine to rule out malignancy. MRI spine was contraindicated in this patient due to his previous gunshot wounds as he had plates inserted in his legs. His blood results are shown in table 1 and CT TAP showed mild diverticulosis and marked paucity of the intra-abdominal fat, with no sinister findings. CT lumbosacral spine showed bilateral L5 spondylolysis with L5-S1 spondylotic changes only. His coeliac and autoimmune screen was negative and anti-insulin antibodies were 7.8 pmol/L (not significant). NCS and electromyography showed sensory action potentials to be either nondetectable or low amplitude while motor responses were slightly slow. Motor conduction test was performed in six nerves and findings were unremarkable in only one nerve. The sensory conduction test was performed on eight nerves and the results were normal in only one nerve. The needle EMG examination was normal in 4 of 11 muscles tested.

Figure 5

Lower limbs of patient showing significant muscle wasting.

Figure 6

Upper limbs of patient showing significant muscle wasting.

Figure 7

Lower limbs of patient showing significant muscle wasting.

Despite excess alcohol consumption the patient’s liver function tests were normal and his CT scan did not show any evidence of chronic liver disease. Patients with DNC need good glycaemic control and require insulin as oral therapies are not sufficient to achieve this. Besides weight loss, autonomic dysfunction, impotence, bowel and bladder problems are quite common in these patients and these usually improve with good glycaemic control.

Outcome and follow-up

The patient was followed up by diabetes team and neurology in the outpatient clinic after 3 months and had good glycaemic response to insulin therapy. He had gained 10 kg of weight and has remarkable improvement in his symptoms since commencement of insulin (figures 8–10). He was seen in ambulatory care a further month later and his HbA1c was 50 mmol/mol and other bloods were unremarkable (table 3). He has ongoing follow-up with diabetes and neurology teams.

Figure 8

Right upper limb picture.

Figure 9

Left upper limb picture.

Figure 10

Lower limbs picture.

Discussion

DNC is a quite rare disorder, which has significant debilitating effects on patients’ physical and mental health and only few dozens of such cases have been reported in the literature.5 Majority of the cases respond symptomatically with good glycaemic control especially with insulin.

However, some patients may need medications such as amitriptyline or gabapentin for neuropathic symptoms transiently. Few cases have been reported to have recurrence of DNC who have responded to antidiabetic treatment. All patients invariably have shown weight gain ranging from 6 to 14 kg.6 Neuropathic findings improved significantly in these patients both subjectively and objectively.6 DNC is more common with type 1 diabetes.6

DNC is associated with uncontrolled diabetes and patients tend to present with profound weight loss, peripheral neuropathy, painful dysesthesias of the lower limb and trunk. Weakness may or may not be present, however, the main difference compared with other neuropathies is the reversibility of DNC with good glycaemic control. It is usually a diagnosis of exclusion. Our patient had profound weight loss and muscle wasting, paraesthesia and night cramps. The common aetiologies including CIDP, alcoholic neuropathy, spinal cord tumours, nutritional deficiencies, toxins and autoimmune polyneuropathies and paraneoplastic syndromes were excluded as discussed in the differential diagnosis. The diagnosis of DNC is further supported by the patient’s weight gain and symptomatic improvement with good glycaemic control after starting insulin therapy and healthy dietary advice.

Another case reported was that of a 65-year-old patient from Chicago. She had weakness in both lower limbs and had pain and weakness in right hand grip along with painful tactile stimuli. She was cachectic (BM1 18) and had lost 35 pounds weight over 5 months, had significant orthostatic hypotension and had hyperalgesia, muscle atrophy with weakness with proximal weakness greater than distal in all extremities. This patient had globally decreased deep tendon reflexes. EMG revealed a sensorimotor polyneuropathy and radionuclide haemodynamic testing and autonomic reflex testing including quantitative sudomotor axon reflex testing confirmed autonomic dysfunction. She was diagnosed with DNC based on her chronic uncontrolled DM and severe weight loss and tests confirming a diffuse neuropathy.7

Another case reported was of a patient with 40-year-Hispanic who developed DNC two times due to poorly controlled diabetes. He presented with numbness and burning sensation in both lower limbs and 18 kg weight loss over 2 months. He responded to treatment, however, was lost to follow-up and presented weight loss over 2 months. He responded to treatment, however, was lost to follow-up and presented again with DNC after 5 months. He had more pronounced paraesthesia now and lost about 23 kg weight over 3 months. He was commenced on insulin however his painful neuropathy did not respond to amitriptyline, fluoxetine, carbamazepine and several other agents and was commenced on methadone subsequently showed symptomatic improvement.

In conclusion, DNC is a potentially reversible condition and early diabetic specialist referral is recommended and these patients often need insulin treatment. Symptoms of muscle wasting and autonomic symptoms often improve however patients with neuropathic pain may need treatment with medications such as amitriptyline, gabapentin and so on, especially if it is present for a longer duration. Good glycaemic control is a key to avoid this serious complication of diabetes mellitus.

Patient’s perspective

My partner has been significantly affected by this disease: mainly his weight loss, reduced appetite and mobility have greatly affected his daily life. He is spending a lot more time in bed due to fatigue and leg weakness. I have been trying to get him to do a bit more exercise, worried that reduced mobility will worsen his muscle wasting even more. He is now taking regular ensure drinks as advised by his dietician. Although he has poor appetite he is doing well on the drinks and trying out various flavours.

He is getting a lot of leg cramps, which worries him a lot and he also had weakness and has lost weight. He is also bothered by the itching, which has got worse over the last few months. He tried to take it easy and try his best to cope. But not being able to be as active and independent as he used to be. We are all concerned about him, particularly his muscle loss, weakness and weight loss. I keep nagging him quite often to encourage him to be active which he has been trying to.

I feel that if we had sought medical advice earlier, things might have been better and he may not have had these complications. I am glad that these issues are now being investigated by Southend hospital specialists and we feel supported by healthcare professionals both in hospital and in the community. We have been given welcome feeling and have been given medical advice whenever we needed.

Learning points

  • Diabetic neuropathic cachexia is not a common condition and clinicians need to be vigilant to identify this condition.

  • Good glycaemic control is extremely important to reverse the complications of diabetic neuropathic cachexia (DNC).

  • It is important to rule out other causes of sensorimotor neuropathy in patients with diabetic neuropathic cachexia described above.

  • Patients with DNC need insulin treatment to reverse its complications and most patients respond well to treatment.

  • Patients with DNC shall be referred to endocrine specialists at the earliest possibility for commencement of insulin and for long-term follow-up.

Acknowledgments

I (ZUK), the author of this case report, am thankful to Dr Nasrullah Ghuman and Dr KaHinKaren Mak who helped me in management and follow up of this patient. ZUK did the literature search on diabetic neuropathic cachexia and diabetic amyotrophy and wrote the case report and was involved in the patient care directly and chased the investigation results. NG reviewed the article and suggested changes to the article and also helped in management of the patient. He also helped in the data analysis and making the provisional diagnosis and he was present during the consenting process and we both explained the findings to the patient and further management and the purpose of case report submission. KM helped us in arranging follow up for this patient, requesting investigations such as EMG and NCS, CT scans and she also collected the patient and their partner perspective about their experience and the disease effects on their life and how did they find this whole experience. KM also took the detailed patient history for the purpose of case report submission. I am thankful to the patient and his partner for their consent to allow us to take his pictures for the purpose of this case report. I am also thankful to the patient for consenting to allow us to publish this case report for other health care professionals to get more awareness about this disease.

Footnotes

  • Contributors ZUK consented the patient and did literature search and wrote the case report myself. I was also involved in the management of the patient and reviewed the patient. I also gathered the data with the help of KM. I also requested KM to kindly request those investigations and has Neurology review for the patient. I also designed the case report and made changes suggested by BMJ admin team and got help from KM to kindly collect the patient and partner perspective for the purpose of case report. NG reviewed the article and helped me in finalising it. He also helped me in the initial diagnosis of the patient and he was also present during the consenting process. He also helped me in writing the final case report and also helped in management of this patient by advising the appropriate diabetic treatment and investigations required. He also helped in the analysis of the data and suggested writing the case report. KM was involved in the patient management and took the detailed patient history including past medical history for the purpose of case report. She also helped in getting the patient and partner perspective for the case report. She also helped me in arranging the investigations for this patient advised by NG and chased Neurology review for us and also collected the reports for us. She was also involved in writing the findings of the patient when we examined the patient for the purpose of case report. She also reviewed the final case report and was happy with the final case report.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer